The Myth about Exercise – Exercise Part I

We will return to more detailed discussions about hormonal obesity but you might be wondering about that other great pillar of current obesity thinking (Caloric Reduction as Primary – CRaP) – Exercise.

To review the Hormonal Obesity part I, part II, part III, part IV, and part V click here.

To start at the very beginning with the Calories series click here. 

The general thinking goes like this.  Obesity is a caloric imbalance – calories in vs calories out.  If the problem is not the calories in, then it must be the calories out.

The ‘calories out’  is more accurately termed Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) which consists of basal metabolic rate (BMR) plus voluntary expenditure (exercise).

TEE = BMR + Exercise

The BMR consists of such metabolic housekeeping tasks as breathing, maintaining body temperature, keeping the heart pumping, maintaining the vital organs etc.

The problem is that the TEE is very difficult to measure.  Therefore, we assume that BMR stays constant.  The only variable we worry about, then, is exercise.  Pretty soon, we make the assumption that TEE is the same as exercise.

One little problem is that the basal metabolic rate does not stay stable.  As we explored in the Calorie series, the BMR can go up or down as much as 50%.  For instance, in response to decreased calories, we can expect BMR to decrease by 40-50%.

However, going back to CRaP theory, we believe that if you could exercise enough, you will ‘burn off’ the calories you take in, and therefore lose weight.  If that were true, then we might expect that as exercise increases, then obesity would decrease over time.  Seems like a reasonable conjecture.  Is it true?

For the vast majority of human history, the idea of exercising was simply ludicrous. Certainly, the idea that there might be health benefits in running or aerobics did not exist up until the 1960s.  Obesity was also not a major issue then.

By 1966 the US Public Health Service began to advocate that increasing physical activity was one of the best ways to lose weight.  Over the ensuing decades, we witnessed a fitness boom.  LA Fitness and other aerobics studios sprouted like mushrooms after a rainstorm.

Books such as The Complete Book of Running by Jim Fixx became a bestseller in 1977.  The fact that he died at age 52 of a massive heart attack was only a minor setback to the cause.  Dr Kenneth Cooper’s book “The New Aerobics” was required reading in the 1980′s where I went to high school.

More and more people began incorporating physical activity into their leisure time.  If exercise were really important in the fight against obesity, then as we increase exercise, we should see obesity decrease just as you might expect with CRaP theory.  You go girl!

Here’s the problem.  As more and more people exercised there was really no effect on obesity at all.  Oh, snap.  The truth comes out, embarrassed as a nudist caught with his clothes on.  Obesity increased even as we sweated with the oldies.  As you can see in the graph above, there is an 82% correlation between exercise and obesity.  That is, as we increase exercise, obesity increases.

That is not to say that exercise causes obesity.  More likely, as we become more obese, we increase exercise to try to lose the weight.  But it doesn’t work.  In fact, the ultimate proof is really personal experience.  Who hasn’t tried to increase exercise to lose weight?  It just didn’t work.

Have a look at this paper “Prevalence of physical activity and obesity in US counties 2001-2011″.  If we believe that low physical activity causes obesity (CRaP), then increasing physical activity should be associated with decreasing obesity.  Sounds legit…

According to the NHANES data there is a general increase in physical activity in the adult population of the USA.  Certain areas (in dark green and blue – Kentucky, Virginia, Florida and the Carolina Twins) are increasing exercise at herculean rates.  You go girl!  So we may well expect a decreasing prevalence of obesity.  Well here’s the dismal truth.

Whether physical activity increases or decreases, there is virtually no relationship to the prevalence of obesity.  There is simply no measurable reduction in obesity from the increased exercise.  It just does not matter.  Irrelevant.  As inconsequential as the busy work that grade school teachers devise to keep children out of mischief.  Higher levels of physical activity did not reduce obesity.

Wait, what about children?  Maybe exercise is more important for childhood obesity?  Let’s look at the article “Association between objectively measured sedentary behaviour and body mass index in preschool children” published in 2013.

Children aged 3-5 had their activity measured using accelerometry and this was compared to their weight.  Here’s their conclusion  “Regardless of cutpoints used, accelerometry-derived sedentary behavior was not independently associated with BMI z-score in two independent samples of preschool children.”

Translation into plain English?  There is no association between activity and obesity.  Aw Dang.

We may also have this preconceived idea that primitive societies had much more exercise than us.  This is the “Cars” hypothesis.  It goes kind of like this.  Primitive societies used to walk everywhere.  Now we drive.  Therefore they were eating alot but they were burning it all off by inadvertant exercise.  Like any good deception, this one sounds pretty reasonable at first.

There is a eensy weensy problem, though.  It is just not true.  Researcher Herman Pontzer found one such modern day hunter gatherer society – the Hadza in Tanzania.  Many days they will travel 15-20 miles to gather food.  With such activity, one might assume that their daily energy expenditure is much higher than a modern day office worker.  In the New York Times “Debunking the Hunter-Gatherer Workout” he discusses the surprising results.

We found that despite all this physical activity, the number of calories that the Hadza burned per day was indistinguishable from that of typical adults in Europe and the United States. We ran a number of statistical tests, accounting for body mass, lean body mass, age, sex and fat mass, and still found no difference in daily energy expenditure between the Hadza and their Western counterparts.

What was that again?  There is no difference in daily calories burned between the walking-all-day Hadza hunter gatherers and my own lazy, car-sitting ass?  Yes.  Oui. Ja.  That is correct, sir.

WTF – How can this be?

The reason is called compensation.  The Hadza, who were walking all day, reduced their physical activity when not necessary.  Those North Americans who were sitting all day, on the other hand, likely increased their activity.

Think about it this way.  If you have been walking all day gathering roots and bugs to eat, the last thing you want to do in your spare time is to go for a 10 km run.  On the other hand, if you have been sitting in a meeting all day, then a 10 km run after work sounds pretty good.

Here’s the bottom line.  There is no measurable association between obesity and physical activity.  I’m not saying exercise is not good for you.  It just doesn’t work that well for weight loss.

We only believe that exercise is effective for weight loss because it has been drilled into our heads since primary school.  The relationship simply does not exist.  Somebody thought it sounded good, but the evidence simply does not back up this relationship.

Continue to Exercise Part II here

Begin here with Calories I

See the full lecture here – The Aetiology of Obesity 1/6 – A New Hope

2019-01-11T11:10:25-05:0016 Comments

About the Author:

Dr. Fung is a Toronto based kidney specialist, having graduated from the University of Toronto and finishing his medical specialty at the University of California, Los Angeles in 2001. He is the author of the bestsellers ‘The Obesity Code’ and ‘The Complete Guide to Fasting’. He has pioneered the use of therapeutic fasting for weight loss and type 2 diabetes reversal in his IDM clinic.

Leave a Reply

15 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Thev2 MagazineAnjalijenMikeMags Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

[…] Comparing the effect of exercise, it is clearly much less beneficial to changes in diet, though.  This, too is not new.  The overwhelmingly important factor in weight gain is diet.  Exercise is secondary.  As we mentioned previously, diet is Batman, exercise is Robin. […]


[…] “Calories” to review why calories do not actually cause weight gain.  The four part Exercise series reveals why exercise, while healthy and beneficial, is a relatively minor part of weight loss.  I […]


[…] The Myth about Exercise – Exercise Part I […]


How about weight lifting shorter workouts and HIIT in comparison to cardio… it should be better …right? More muscles lead to better insulin sensitivity but also reducing cortisol ( If you don’t exercise too long) so maybe hormonal reason is fine and also when we gain muscles its more lean body mass and BMR rise little bit…? 🙂 Please some positive answer:-) ha ha


I don’t know the answer 100% but I suspect that HIT is better than cardio.


[…] start by looking at a series of blog posts by Jason Fung of Intensive Diet Management that have been doing the rounds on social media. He, […]


Weight-bearing exercise increase lean muscle mass, increase BMR. Perfect example in myself – i did weight-bearing exercise (sometimes combined with some aerobic exercise/pilates 6day/week for 50-60minutes) was fit, strong & lean. I suffered an injury had a knee operation and a total hip replacement – stopped my exercise, did not change anything else – i gained weight, no, not weight, pure fat – every inactive month a little bit, till it stopped at +7kg. MUSCLE % is the key factor, not aerobic exercise. So exercise DOES make a difference, also in strength and life expectancy.


[…] his series of blog posts, Jason Fung is unequivocal. ‘Exercise is good for you,’ he writes. ‘There are many benefits […]


[…] start by looking at a series of blog posts by Jason Fung of Intensive Diet Management that have been doing the rounds on social media. He, […]


[…] la “teoría del coche“: antes se iba andando a todas partes, ahora se va en coche. ¡Ahora se gasta menos energía […]


Dr Fung, It’s very well written article i have to say and it really opened my mind about weight loss and exercise. I’m a type 2 diabetic myself and have put vigorous efforts to reverse it which I believe is similar to what you do. I mainly eat a high fat / moderate protein / low carbs 80% of the time. I also exercise at least 3 times a week. Specifically weightlifting (power and olympic styles) plus crossfit high intensity workouts after the weightlifting moves (as my form of cardio) and this has accelerated NOT weight loss but “Fat” loss.… Read more »


[…] here to go to Exercise part I, and part […]


[…] the exercise myth and why exercise is not effective for weight loss in far more detail on his blog and I highly recommend you read what he has to […]


Why do backpackers who go out walking for 6 months lose so much weight?


Thank you for sharing a very informative article with us. I loved the way you explain. I loved to share this stuff. Keep it up and keep stay updates us about health topics like this.

Thev2 Magazine

Thanks for this wonderful information.
Exercise is one of the most powerful ways to take control of your health. Not only can it prevent heart disease, strokes, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s and cancer, it has been shown to help with depression, insomnia and stress.
I hope this information will really help everyone to get motivated toward the importance of exercises not only for lose weight but to live a healthy life.