The Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis is Wrong – Hormonal Obesity VI

/, Health and Nutrition, Hormonal Obesity/The Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis is Wrong – Hormonal Obesity VI

Let’s return to discussing the causes of obesity.  To start with the Hormonal Obesity Part I click here.Obesity Facts 1-4

Let’s recap.  We’ve explored why the Caloric Reduction as Primary (CRaP) model also known as the calories in, calories out theory is wrong in the Calorie series.  By looking at causal rather than correlation studies, we can see that the hormones insulin and cortisol can both cause obesity.

Hormonal Obesity Theory

We can give people insulin and cortisol and they will gain weight.   When we take it away, they will lose the weight.  For the moment we will focus on insulin, since that tends to be the bigger player in obesity.

Once we accept the fact that insulin causes obesity, then we will want to know what caused the increased insulin levels that caused obesity in the first place.  The most obvious candidate is the fattening carbohydrates.  These are the highly refined grains and sugars.

Because these carbohydrates are highly refined, they tend to raise blood sugars and blood insulin levels quickly.  This will tend to cause weight gain and obesity.  This is known as the Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis (CIH), and is the basis of the Atkins diet and many other low carbohydrate (Dukan) and very-low-carbohydrate diets (ketogenic diet).Carb Insulin Hypoth

However, it quickly becomes clear that this hypothesis must be either wrong or incomplete.  The most obvious problem is that of the Asian rice eaters of the 1990′s.  East Asians tend to eat a lot of rice compared to North Americans.  Most of their rice consumption is white rice, which is a refined carbohydrate. Obesity rates by continent

If they are eating so much refined carbohydrates, then you would expect that the Chinese in the 1990′s would be extremely obese.  The problem, of course, was that this was not so.  There were very low obesity rates in East Asia until more recently in the 2000′s when their diet became much more Westernized.Intermap1  Poor fools.

It is useful to study these historic patterns because many diets have become much more Westernized during this current period of globalization.

Let’s look at this study:

Nutrient intakes of middle-aged men and women in China, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States in the late 1990s: The INTERMAP Study – Journal of Human Hypertension (2003) 17, 623–630 Zhou BF

Using 24-hour dietary recall and 24 hour urine samples they compared the diets of 4 groups of people from the USA, UK, China and Japan.Intermap2

The total carbohydrate intake in China was far in excess of the other nations.  If the CIH was correct, this would predict that obesity in China would be the highest of the group.  This is not true.

There is clearly something else going on here.  While the total carbohydrate intake was very high, the intake of sugar was very low compared to the rest of the world.  There seems to be something specific to sugar that may be much more obesogenic than other carbohydrates.

Japan is also very interesting.  While total carbohydrate intake is not higher, sugar intake is also lower than either the US or the UK.  Japan also had very low levels of obesity until recently.

There is one other major difference in refined carbohydrate intake.  East Asians tend to take most of their carbohydrates as rice whereas Western societies tend to take their carbohydrate as refined wheat and corn products.

It is possible that rice is less obesogenic than wheat.  There are some who also postulate that wheat that we eat currently is far different from the original wheat that was grown.  One of the New York Times bestsellers is a book called Wheat Belly that suggests this is the major problem.  It is certainly true that 99% of commercially grown wheat is dwarf and semi-dwarf varieties.  The health implications of changing the wheat are unknown, so it remains a very real possibility.

We will unravel the mystery of the 1990′s Thin Chinese Rice Eater in due course.  The answer is far more nuanced than we can cover in this post.  However, what we can say at this point is that the CIH in its current state is not correct.  It is an incomplete theory.

In a similar light, we can point to a multitude of primitive societies that eat predominantly carbohydrate diets.  The Kitavans, for instance, studied by Stefan Lindeberg ate a high carbohydrate diet but had a very low serum insulin and virtually no obesity.Kitava Insulin  Despite a 70% carbohydrate (unrefined) intake, the Kitavans had serum insulin levels below the 5th percentile of the Swedes.

So, it seems that low insulin levels associates with low obesity rates, it is not at all clear that high carbohydrate intake is the primary cause of high insulin levels.

Similarly, the Okinawans eat plenty of sweet potatoe (carbohydrate).  Yet they are one of the longest lived peoples in the world and have historically had very little obesity.

The CIH reflects modern medical knowledge circa 1850 when Banting published “A Letter on Corpulence”.  While it is not entirely wrong, it is not entirely right either.  This has led many to abandon this theory rather than try to reconcile it with the known facts.

The link from insulin to obesity seems very solid.  Giving insulin to people causes weight gain and taking it away leads to weight loss.  However, it is the link from carbohydrates to insulin that is incomplete.  There are many things that can lead to increase in insulin, as well as many things that can lead to a decrease in insulin.

The carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis is not so much wrong as incomplete.  The notion that carbohydrates are the only driver of insulin is incorrect.  We need to know what increases and decreases insulin.

In order to develop a more complete understanding of the causes of obesity, we will need to discuss the phenomenon known as insulin resistance.  We will need to look at the importance of meal timing.  We will need to look at the tradtional role of fasting.  We will discuss diabetes in detail.

We will need to explore the role of fiber.  We will discuss resistant starch.  We will need to explore the role of vinegar.  We will look at fructose and sugars in more detail.  We will need to look at the role of wheat specifically.

Strap on your seatbelts – we will be taking off shortly.

Continue to Hormonal Obesity Part VII here.

Begin here with Calories I

See the entire lecture – The Aetiology of Obesity 2/6 – The New Science of Diabesity

2017-09-02T11:54:31+00:00 8 Comments

About the Author:

Dr. Fung is a Toronto based kidney specialist, having graduated from the University of Toronto and finishing his medical specialty at the University of California, Los Angeles in 2001. He is the author of the bestsellers ‘The Obesity Code’ and ‘The Complete Guide to Fasting’. He has pioneered the use of therapeutic fasting for weight loss and type 2 diabetes reversal in his IDM clinic.

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "The Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis is Wrong – Hormonal Obesity VI"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Bob Haberty
Guest

I love your focus on meal timing – before discovering your videos and web site, I tried intermittent fasting to see if it would help my blood sugar levels and was amazed at how quickly they normalized. I have since switched from skipping breakfast to skipping dinner and am hoping that the results will be similar.

hana
Guest
I love your style of writing, Its so funny!! Can I use some of your lectures in my czech web? of cuuse with link to you, I am trying to spread IF and Low carb movement in czech republic, here they are very into carbs and exercise too, so I am working on the change but because I don’t have medicine school its hard to get the audience, thats why I want to show them that there is a lot great science behind fasting and Low carb approach. I hope when the project will rise we can do some interview… Read more »
kfacwpup

No problem. Any of the materials on the website or YouTube are freely available as long as you credit the source and link back to the site.

hana
Guest

Thank you very much, Its really gorgeous, I was into LCHF and Andreas Eenfeldt, he is great but I still didn’t have some answers and you put the missing peaces into my puzzles and help me to understand it. Thanks so much.

Mary Jo Kringas
Guest
Hello Dr. Fung, your article here is fascinating. Your quote So, it seems that low insulin levels associates with low obesity rates, it is not at all clear that high carbohydrate intake is the primary cause of high insulin levels. is the most interesting to me. My glucose measures are consistently lower than people who are thinner than I am… so it would seem that I am making more insulin than them. I have managed my weight by measuring and then controlling my glucose levels but I would rather measure my insulin levels several times a day, as I do… Read more »
trackback

[…] which I’ve written about in a previous post – unimaginatively titled “The Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis is Wrong“. The Asian diet of the 1990s for example were very high in carbohydrates, but did not lead […]

trackback

[…] פוסט זה מוגש כשירות לציבור. הזכויות על התוכן שייכות לכותב של הפוסט המקורי. את הפוסט המקורי ניתן למצוא בכתובת הזאת. […]

Tamara Tilleman
Guest

Ketosis (>70%) and Carbosis (<10%, and some say 5%) yield the same result. Now we need a new Einstein that will create the NGR nutrition general relativity theory.